The Rocscience International Conference 2021 Proceedings are now available. Read Now
 

Search Results

Arch Snap-Thru Probability

This is the primary failure mode of interest in a Voussoir analysis. The essential feature of a roof supported by a Voussoir action are illustrated in the figure below, for a horizontal beam. Deflection has been exaggerated for purposes of illustration.

Problem geometry for Voussoir stability analysis (Hutchinson et al., 1996)

Like elastic buckling, "arch snap-thru" is highly dependent on geometry (span/depth ratio) and rock mass modulus. However, the driving force for gravity buckling is the self-weight of the rock, whereas the driving force for elastic buckling is the externally applied lateral stress. As such, they are entirely different modes of failure, although both are referred to as buckling failure modes.

The buckling parameter calculated in a Voussoir analysis represents the percentage of unstable arch configurations for a given geometry and rock mass modulus, as determined by the Voussoir analysis iteration procedure. A buckling parameter = 35% has been determined (Hutchinson et al., 1996) as a limit above which a roof should be considered unstable. This design limit of 35% happens to correspond to midspan deflection = 10% of the beam thickness. Therefore arch stability can also be assessed by monitoring the displacement at midspan, relative to the undeflected state. The AVERAGE displacement at midspan (for all statistical combinations of input parameters) is displayed along with the arch snap-thru statistics.

"Failure Probability" display

The display of "failure probability" is slightly different than that used for other CPillar failure modes. The shaded portion of the distribution curve indicates buckling parameters > 35 (rather than factor of safety values < 1). Also, the failure probability is stated as either: LOW, MEDIUM, HIGH, or VERY HIGH, rather than a precise numerical value, due to the nature of a Voussoir stability analysis. These failure probabilities correspond to mean buckling parameter ranges as indicated in the table below.

Failure probabilities (Voussoir analysis) corresponding to mean buckling parameter ranges

Failure Probability

Mean Buckling Parameter

LOW

0-10

MEDIUM

10-25

HIGH

25-50

VERY HIGH

> 50

Note

The design curves of Beer & Meek (1982) correspond to the CPillar solution when the buckling parameter (in CPillar) just reaches 100 (i.e.. 99 to 100). This represents a mathematically critical state which will lead to collapse at the slightest disturbance, and as such is not a conservative design limit. The CPillar recommended limit for arch snap-thru stability (buckling parameter < 35) is based on a more conservative but realistic approach to the voussoir concept of roof stability. See Hutchinson et al. (1996) for full details.

Account Icon - click here to log in or out of your account Shopping Cart icon Click here to search our site Click here to close Learning Tech Support Documentation Info Chevron Delete Back to Top View More" PDF File Calendar Location Language Fees Video Click here to visit Rocscience's LinkedIn page Click here to visit Rocscience's YouTube page Click here to visit Rocscience's Twitter page Click here to visit Rocscience's Facebook page Click here to visit Rocscience's Instagram page Bookmark Network Scroll down for more Checkmark Download Print Back to top Single User Multiple Users CPillar Dips EX3 RocFall RocPlane RocSupport RocTopple RS2 RS3 RSData RSPile Settle3 Slide2 Slide3 SWedge UnWedge Commercial License Education License Trial License Shop safe & secure Money-back guarantee